Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Syracuse Fans Are Facing An Elite Problem

First, there was the media backlash against Syracuse's rise to No. 1.

Then there was the Syracuse fan backlash to that backlash.

Then there was a second wave of targeted media backlash that tried to prove the initial backlash.

Then there was a second wave of Syracuse fan backlash on that second wave of media backlash.

Now there's a Syracuse fan backlash against the Syracuse fan backlash of the media backlash which followed the initial Syracuse fan backlash to the initial media backlash.

Deep breath.

I can absolutely understand how tired everyone is of hearing Syracuse Orange fans complain about the lack of respect (or perceived respect) that we're receiving despite being 20-0 and the No. 1 team in the nation for six-straight weeks.

There have been two great pieces written on this site trying to get to the heart of why SU fans get so easily riled up over the generic arguments made by people who have probably watched a grand total of 30 minutes of Syracuse basketball all season.

VotePrime's piece on how Syracuse fans are not equipped mentally to deal with success really seemed to hit home. I can speak from experience on that. Despite our record, ranking and everything I've seen all season long, there's still a part of me that expects us to get blown out by thirty points and exposed as frauds every time the team takes the court. Once the game is underway that feeling fades away but beforehand, well, there's a reason I don't make too many predictions.

The other piece was I miss DIAP!'s Why We Complain article, which touches on some of the same points and then goes to look at the situation as objectively as possible, coming to the conclusion that our detractors are who we think they are. If all they do is look at boxscores, schedules and RPI rankings, then yes, we don't look all that amazing. But anyone who's actually watched the games knows better.

I've been thinking about this whole thing since last night and why we (including myself) get so fired up when Hubert Davis complains about our lack of a go-to guy and then, following our big win led by four different go-to guys, claims Missouri and not Syracuse is the most tournament-ready team in the land. Who the hell is Hubert Davis, anyway?

It all came together for me when, following Dick Vitale's comments during the Kansas-Baylor game that Syracuse would not be beaten during the regular season, Andy Glockner tweeted the following:

I wonder if Dickie V thinks Syracuse will get past the Sweet 16 for the third time since 1990.

My initial thought was, "What the f***? Was that necessary?"

My second thought was, "See, this is why Syracuse fans get riled up. Because people will use any excuse to take random shots at us cause, for some reason, they just don't like us. And then when we call them on it, we're the ***holes because we bite on their #TrollHard move. I bet North Carolina and Duke never gets all this grief when they're No. 1."

My third thought was, "Crap...he's right."

Syracuse basketball, and its fanbase, has an elite problem. We think we are and, the honest truth is, we're technically not. Yet.

Star-divide

If you were just looking at the last four seasons, including this one, you could make a pretty easy case that Syracuse is an elite basketball program. Two separate No. 1 rankings. An NCAA Tournament one-seed. Two trips to the Sweet Sixteen. Almost the entire four-year span ranked and ranked high.

There's only a handful of programs that also sustained such standards during the same span. However, it's everything that happened before that which presents our dilemma.

Statistically-speaking, Glockner is right. For all of the great things Jim Boeheim has accomplished, there is a lot of NCAA Tournament dead space in between those Final Four runs. After the Orange went to the National Title game in 1987 and the Elite 8 in 1989, they didn't make it past the Sweet Sixteen again until 1996. And then again until 2003. And not since.

It's true that when we do make it that far, we make it count (Three Final Fours and a National Championship under Boeheim), but that reputation lingers. And if you discount the 2003 National Title, the 00's weren't exactly a banner decade as a whole for Boeheim. Three NIT berths, 2 NCAA 1st round exits, 2 NCAA 2nd round exits and 3 Sweet Sixteens.

Yes, 95% of the programs out there would kill for those results but we don't want to be just better than 95% of the other programs out there. We want to better than 99%. We want to be The One Percent.

We feel as though Syracuse is among the five best college basketball programs in the nation, year in and year out. And we should be treated as such.

And that's just not happening. Because a lot of people in the media are still holding on to that old patterning (Syracuse plays weak schedule, Syracuse fattens up on cupcakes, Syracuse won't do anything in the tournament). And whether we admit it or not, all of that stuff is swirling around in our heads as well.

We're terrified that it's true. We're scared out of our minds that Syracuse is going to finish the regular season undefeated and then lose in the second round of the NCAA Tournament.

And so when Doug Gottlieb or Pat Forde or whoever else drops a snipe remark about the 2011-2012 Syracuse Orange basketball team, they're not attacking this singular team. They're attacking the entire history, tradition and reputation of Syracuse basketball. At least to us as fans. They're reinforcing that, at the end of the day, Syracuse can dress up like an elite program all they like but we're still a pretender. A second-tier program.

The only people who can change this are the coaches and players. We as fans are helpless in this battle. All we can do is stick to our guns, be there to cheer on our team and sense for ourselves that this isn't your father's Syracuse basketball program. It's not even your older sibling's Syracuse basketball program. If this team does what we think they're capable of, there will be no denying that Syracuse is an elite program, worthy of it's place among the very best.

Maybe it won't prove anything to them. But it might just prove something to ourselves.

Comment 69 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Back when I posted on ESPN (shudder)

I did up a lengthy post about where Syracuse ranks in terms of all-time elite status. The conclusion was essentially the same; Syracuse has had great success under Boeheim, especially the last decade or so but have yet to cement their place in the elite tier. Maybe it’s time to give that one a dustoff and an update.

"If I ain't gonna be part of the greatest, I gotta be the greatest myself." Busta Rhymes

by FeloniousPhunk on Jan 17, 2012 1:07 PM EST reply actions  

Are we as a fan (as a whole) lagging our team too?

Watching the fans a Phog Allen last night after just watching us at the Dome I had the thought that we fans are really not keeping up with the teams level of success. The level of intensity the Kansas fans were putting out during the whole game puts us to shame. I know the Syracuse culture kind of works against intensity but if we have put the amount of work we put into introspection and critical review into positive representation we could put our fandom at an elite level. Thus helping the program slide into that elite level we aspire too.
/typedramblings

by OrangeUglad on Jan 17, 2012 1:16 PM EST reply actions  

If that atmosphere at SU home games isn't good ...

Then why do media members discount every one of our wins at home?

http://cusepulp.blogspot.com/

by Lots of Pulp on Jan 17, 2012 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

People talk about the Orange being like Syracuse's pro team

Since it’s the only game in town. I would imagine its like that X50 in Lawrence.

"If I ain't gonna be part of the greatest, I gotta be the greatest myself." Busta Rhymes

by FeloniousPhunk on Jan 17, 2012 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Capacity may also play into it

Allen Fieldhouse holds about 17,000 – theoretically, the most enthusiastic 17k fans at the Dome might match up with these KU fans, but then there are another 5k – 10k less enthusiastic SU fans bringing down the curve at the Dome.

This space for rent

by Mike84 on Jan 17, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

good point

I was never able to attend a game at Manley but old(er) timers said it was crazy. I just shake my head sometimes at the apathy so many show at the Dome. Especially in the ’good" seats. I know a lot of that is do to “Corporate” seats and it happens in many if not all other sports venues. I just cry inwardly seeing that someone has their ass at the Dome and act as if they are sitting on a quiet park bench. (AND NOT WEARING ANY ORANGE grrrr)

by OrangeUglad on Jan 17, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Corporate Seats

The seats next to us in 112 are corporate seats and are NEVER used. The only time they are used are for the sellout type games. It works pretty well for us to put our coats somewhere, but it is just pathetic.

Last night I actually told the people in front of us to feel free and stand as much as they wanted to because they kept sitting down near the end of the game because they didn’t want to ruin our view. We were standing anyways so it didn’t bother me.

by GrossSuperman on Jan 17, 2012 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Also - people are old.

The Dome has been open since 1980 and a lot of the people who have the good seats have had them since that date. If you were a 32-year old loudmouth in 1980 you are now a 64-year old who often doesn’t go to weeknight games because they end too late. I don’t know how many student tickets are available for basketball, but at Phog there are 4,000 (out of a capacity of around 16,000). The proportion of students in the Dome bleachers is, I’m sure, much less than 1 in 4.

by Cuse Country on Jan 17, 2012 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

yup

exactly, and that its a football stadium

G-Mac bitches

BC 2011

by jdguggs10 on Jan 17, 2012 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Sean, excellent post

It is who we are, our geography, climate, culture, and those stupid analysts.

Since the early 1990's I have not been able to get Mike Hopkins' bloody face out of my brain. I don't remember what game it was but I'll never forget that as my first memory of SU basketball. Mike Hopkins, bloody face, bloody nose, all for the love of Syracuse.

by JFerg393 on Jan 17, 2012 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

Humbling

Reading this hit hard. You’re absolutely right (of course). Kind of hurts to hear, but it makes me want that consistency and elite status even more.

by Velocityy on Jan 17, 2012 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

We already have elite status.

Look at the record books.

What you are saying is you want the national attention of the hype that goes with that elite status.

We are the 7th or 8th program all time in the number of wins, we are #1 in the BE in that category, our coach is number 4 on the list and is a Hall of Famer. How about some quiet security and self confidence in who and what we are?

by NoXCUSE99 on Jan 17, 2012 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Not much different than politics

The results on the court are what really matters, not the opinions of the sports pundits. I can’t be bothered worrying about this much.

They aren’t any different from Limbaugh, Jon Stewart, Rachel Maddow, Bill O’Reilly, etc etc – for the most part, they are paid to spout off opinions based on shallow, cursory analysis of a wide range of teams, players, and topics. They are spread across such a wide spectrum at this level that there is little chance of getting enough knowledge on one particular team (or politician), so they really do need to fall back on cliches in order to make their deadlines and have a life.

And – in because of all of SU’s regular season success, their NCAA tournament record is pretty disappointing for the most part during Boeheim’s tenure. I’ll give them a pass in ‘09 because of AO’s injury, but think back on all the tournament disappointments I’ve watched: from OSU, Navy, and URI thru Richmond, UMass, and onto Alabama, Vermont and Marquette, they really have underperformed in post-season play.

Perhaps a lot of that is due to using a 7 man rotation through the gruelling Big East schedule year after year – a problem we don’t have this year, so we’ll see how it goes.

This space for rent

by Mike84 on Jan 17, 2012 1:27 PM EST reply actions  

well...

pundits do matter. All those figureheads you mentioned do wield political influence and power on elections…

G-Mac bitches

BC 2011

by jdguggs10 on Jan 17, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Good article

sums up the dissonance between where we think we are and where we actually are as a basketball program.

Our program had not really risen to national prominence until the late 70s/early 80s, long after the blue-blood Kentucky/Duke/UNC/UCLA/Indiana programs were well established.

If Hopkins is able to keep up this level of recruiting and coaching, we will be well fit to reach that last tier where the pundits/public just expect we will be a title contender year in and year out – which I think is what sticks in our craw – we aren’t given the benefit of the doubt despite our rankings and are still seen as some sort of interloper into the blue blooded elite programs rankings..but it seems like we are expecting too much too soon. Also, our barrier to entry will be a lot tougher, since there are more programs than ever vying for talent and a lot of other teams on the same trajectory as we are.

But we are Syracuse, and if we keep up, we will reach that far.

by Pinker on Jan 17, 2012 1:30 PM EST reply actions  

Lacrosse

I look at Syracuse basketball kind of like how I look at Duke or Cornell lacrosse.

When I look at lacrosse, Syracuse, Hopkins, Princeton and Virginia are who I would consider the elites (Princeton is even waning at this point as far as I am concerned).

Duke and Cornell have been really successful lately, but they really aren’t in that top tier. They want to be considered elite but they really are on the outside looking in until they have a sustained measure of success which means multiple championship game appearances in recent years and multiple championships.

by GrossSuperman on Jan 17, 2012 1:31 PM EST reply actions  

er.. I guess this makes the point

By many standards around here I must be an old fogee… I believe SU is elite. I remember times before ESPN existed! When ESPN contracted with the Big East for regular twice a week Hoops broadcasts…. thats when I bought cable TV. The Pearl, Sherman Douglas 3-TIME ALL AMERICAN. Seikley vs Ewing. Nova over Gtown, St Johns DC & Billy Owens. All this topped with the 5th all time wins gives me confidence SU is elite… but the truth of our performances in the NCAA tourney is disappointing. Nuff said… when Superman above diss’ Cornell… well I guess he doesnt remember the 1970s and early 80s when Hopkins and Cornell were DOMINANT; Cornell had a 3 yr undeafeated streak at one point… and Hobart was as feared a NYS rival as SU. In almost all things in this country popular perception is skewed to what the vast population saw on TV in the last few days… which is why it is important that our knowledgeable public, using all forms of pushback, remains engaged and keeps the talking heads wary of ignoring facts at their peril.

by supgs on Jan 18, 2012 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

+1 on cornell lax in the 70s/80s

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is my analogy

Person A calls Person B “a fatty.” If Person B is thin, the conclusion is that Person A is delusional and ignored. if Person B is obese, Person A can be summed up as a jerk and ignored.

But if Person B is slightly overweight, now there are problems. Person B is not-obese, so can argue with Person A over the accuracy of the statement. Person B is also not thin enough to ignore it and feel hurt. Deep down, Person B knows that there is enough truth in the statement.

That is us. We are not elite enough to ignore those who criticize the school. But we are also too elite to ignore those who question our level of elite-ness. Therefore, it’s a battle. Also, we are not a great halfcourt team. We do not have a money player—although we have four players that can and may wear the role for us down the stretch. Kind of like QBs… if you have two, you have zero. Same thing. Whether it truly matters is another. But there is a kernel of truth.

The bottom line is that, for all JB’s wins, most Marches have been disappointments. The ones that weren’t were spectacular. With the exception of a few losses (i.e. Oklahoma, Duke, and Kansas stick out), most of our losses have been games we either could have or should have won… or both.

The ONLY thing that matters is March and April. In those months, teams play like Pitt did last night… only with older players even if less talent. A veteran team used to winning is able to slow the game, limit turnovers, and force us to get out of our own game. Some years, we have the right combination to get past those hurdles. But in too many years, the successes of November to January do not show up in March (or are used up in the BET).

Dictated, but not read.

http://atlanticcoastconfidential.wordpress.com/

by ezcuse on Jan 17, 2012 1:44 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

That’s probably the best analogy I’ve heard yet, EZ

If you're going to be stupid, you're going to have to be tough

by FatK44 on Jan 17, 2012 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

well said

the thing that sucks about JB’s tourney record isn’t necessarily the lack of FFs or NCs, but the teams who often knock SU out. i won’t list them because you all know how unimpressive the list is…

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I've had this argument/talk before what programs would you surely place above SU?

I had UCLA, Duke, UNC, Kansas, Kentucky as my top 5 (no particular order there) and after that I feel Syracuse could fall anywhere from 6-15 being completely honest

by swag surfin on Jan 17, 2012 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

top 5 is good...

I think Indiana is a clear #6.

Only 3 final fours and 1 national championship in the Boeheim era I think means we’re behind Michigan St.

I’d have to put UCONN’s 3 titles ahead of us.

I think we’re in that 9-12 range with teams like Maryland, Illinois, Georgetown, Arizona, Memphis

by cuse 04 on Jan 17, 2012 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Last 20 years

I’d say we’re probably a top 10 program. No way we’re better than Michigan St, UConvict, Duke, UNC, Kansas, Kentucky. Anybody else I’m missing from the past 20 years?

Without Gerry McNamara we wouldn't have won 10 f-- games, not 10

by PoetryInMoten on Jan 17, 2012 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

Last 20 years I'm not sure

but UF has been solid the last decade and could be up there in the argument. been to 3 championships winning 2 of them.

by swag surfin on Jan 17, 2012 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right, we're not an elite program

Coaches of elite programs leaves the walk-ons out there and the coach and the “elite stars” leaves for the safety of their locker room with 14.2 seconds to go. If that’s an elite program, thanks, but no thanks, I’ll stick with Boeheim and Syracuse. I’m Boeheim would abandon his players out there to fend for themselves..

by Elitist on Jan 17, 2012 1:47 PM EST reply actions  

oops

That should be, “I’m sure Boeheim wouldn’t abandon his playrs………”

by Elitist on Jan 17, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair point

Classy move, Roy

Troy Nunes Is An Absolute Magician - The Syracuse blog that cares.

If you've got time, buy my book "How To Grow An Orange", visit SeanKeeley.com and follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

by Sean Keeley on Jan 17, 2012 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I read the article about that today

He apologized to the 5 who finished out the game. His intent was to pull everyone and skip the last 14 seconds entirely. I actually think FSU’s coach suggested it.

Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-tip

by MrPlow99 on Jan 17, 2012 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

this is completely off-topic

i don’t even know if it counts as a cheap shot because… it’s irrelevant?

this sounds like general CNY bitterness just looking for a target.

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish I could unread this...

and go back to believing we are an elite, blue chip dynasty. I feel all dirty and Wake Foresty now.

by Robdanjoe on Jan 17, 2012 2:06 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Just wait

This team is most likely gonna win the natty title.

We all know for a fact that next years squad will win the natty title and maybe go undefeated.

Nothing like ye ol back to back titles to cement your status, plus the ACC move, were like the 80s Miami program but in college bball.

G-Mac bitches

BC 2011

by jdguggs10 on Jan 17, 2012 2:26 PM EST reply actions  

Since he said it first

A ridiculous, stupid, asinine thought did cross my mind last night. 88 in a row. The extreme hypothetical: Syracuse wins the 2012 national title undefeated, that’s 40-0 (31 regular season games, 3 BET games, 6 NCAA games). Everyone pulls a Florida, says, “Hey, let’s win back to back titles” and comes back. Scoop and KJ, obviously, are gone anyway but a returning core of Fab/Dion/CJ and Triche are more than adequate replacements. If everyone who is eligible returns, next year’s team could be just as good (if not better) than this year’s. If the improbable 40-0 were to happen this season, there’s nothing to say that an even better team wouldn’t do the same. In the EXTREMELY unlikely event that those things happen, would it really be a stretch to think that the Orange could start the 2013-14 season 9-0 (for a total of 89 straight winds over 2+ seasons)?

I know. Not gonna happen. But it did cross my mind.

"If I ain't gonna be part of the greatest, I gotta be the greatest myself." Busta Rhymes

by FeloniousPhunk on Jan 17, 2012 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

You just invoked the mother of all jinxes

Spit on the floor, toss salt over both shoulders, knock on wood, and kiss a picture of John Wooden.

by Mike I. on Jan 17, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Like I said

Guggs said it first. :-p I wash my hands of all culpability

"If I ain't gonna be part of the greatest, I gotta be the greatest myself." Busta Rhymes

by FeloniousPhunk on Jan 17, 2012 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

It's almost so jinxy

it unjinxed itself

Troy Nunes Is An Absolute Magician - The Syracuse blog that cares.

If you've got time, buy my book "How To Grow An Orange", visit SeanKeeley.com and follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

by Sean Keeley on Jan 17, 2012 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

This is our year

Or bust.

We may have more talent in future teams, but this team gels together in that way that can be special. So this current team has a chance to be special in a way that few other SU team have. But being special means not being repeated the next year. This is not Florida where a core of NBA-ready players all come back. The only question mark is Waiters.

Next year, if Waiters is gone, that sets us back talent-wise. And even though he is not entirely ready, he is ready enough for some NBA team to take a chance. I think Boeheim knows it too.

Even if Waiters stays, we’ll lose some of the selflessness that has made this current team 20-0. If he is coming back, it is only to take his game to the next level to impress the NBA. Meanwhile, this will be Triche’s last chance to make his mark. So he is going to want to score more too.

It’s 2012 or bust folks. And don’t get me started on the Mayans…

Dictated, but not read.

http://atlanticcoastconfidential.wordpress.com/

by ezcuse on Jan 17, 2012 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

DEAL.

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Since you said it first (like Felonius, I'm going to wash my hands of culpability)

I think it’s possible — unlikely, but possibly — that we could go through the regular season unscathed. That scares me, though. I never want to lose, but I’d feel less nervous with a loss out of the way before the Big Dance.

On a different note, my friend was sitting two rows behind John Wallace. When she asked him what he thought about this team, he said he thought they’d win the national championship. I’ve trusted in John Wallace since I was 9. I don’t plan on stopping now.

If you're going to be stupid, you're going to have to be tough

by FatK44 on Jan 17, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

It doesn't help

that Connecticut, under Calhoun, has won 3 National Titles in the past 15 years.

by kd bart on Jan 17, 2012 2:47 PM EST reply actions  

There is room for two elite teams in a conference

We just need another national title. Or at least deep March runs. We’ve got to stop letting inferior teams beat us in March.

Even without AO, we could have beaten Butler and would have if we had cherished the basketball. Instead, we turned it over and had poor shot selection. Same with Marquette last year.

Maybe we don’t win the title those years, but we need to force the better teams to beat us a lot more often than we have.

Dictated, but not read.

http://atlanticcoastconfidential.wordpress.com/

by ezcuse on Jan 17, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

As far

as I’m concerned there’s 5 elite college basketball programs. North Carolina, UCLA, Duke, Kansas, and Kentucky. You can make the argument UCLA has fallen out of elite status due to their long final four and title droughts between 1980 and 1995 and now 1995 to present day. UCLA has been to 4 final fours since 1980. Syracuse has been to 3. Indiana is floating in there somewhere but I don’t know if they are elite.

After that tier everyone else is a hodge podge. To get to a UNC/Duke/Kansas/Kentucky level is going to take a decade long run of final fours. Could it happen? Sure, but while Cuse fans may want to get to that level (who wouldn’t) there’s no shame in not being there.

by krackatoan on Jan 17, 2012 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

UCLA is like Notre Dame in football

It’s always good to beat them… you are never surprised when they have a good season… but beating them just isn’t what it used to be. I’d drop them out. If we beat UCLA on the road, it would not mean any more than beating Michigan or North Carolina State.

I’d argue that Michigan State might deserve a nod. Two championships during the Boeheim era. Izzo went to a number of final fours too. The 2003 team winning at Breslin was impressive and a good jumping off point for the team. A very very difficult place to play.

Indiana probably falls in with UCLA. But they are more like Alabama in football. They did have one good post-Knight year. And this year is shaping up nicely. But not much otherwise, including some disasters.

UConn and Florida are too new to be elite. Syracuse doesn’t have enough titles or March success. Louisville hasn’t had enough recent success. Georgetown hasn’t made enough final fours lately.

So I would put UNC, Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, and Michigan State in the first tier. Indiana when having a good year.

The second tier would be Syracuse, UConn, Florida, Louisville, and Georgetown. I’d also include UCLA when they are having a good year.

Other teams that might deserve second tier? Arizona. Wisconsin (needs more NCAA runs). Pittsburgh (needs some NCAA runs). Villanova. West Virginia. Gonzaga. Xavier. Etc.

Dictated, but not read.

http://atlanticcoastconfidential.wordpress.com/

by ezcuse on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Michigan State

I would put them right up there in the top tier. I think the stat is that every single player that Izzo has coached at Michigan State (assuming they stayed for 4 years) played in the final four. That is pretty powerful I think.

by GrossSuperman on Jan 17, 2012 4:30 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Arizona

if you’re considering Syracuse second tier then Arizona has to be in there too. They have 200 less wins than the Cuse but also 200 less games. 28 NCAA tourney appearances including 25 in a row. 4 final fours. One title. Can’t have one without the other.

Agree on MSU, but that is more of a now effect. They were awful between 79 and 1999. They only MADE the tournament 8 times in those 20 years. An elite school does not go through those spells which is why Kentucky,Kansas,Duke, and UNC are the only lock it up elite programs in my eyes. Cases can be made for Indiana,UCLA, and MSU next after that. Then I would agree with your other tiers.

by krackatoan on Jan 17, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

NCAA Record

Perception is 100% about a team’s record in the NCAA tournament. Boeheim’s track record is good but not truly great and that’s reflected in the national opinion. He gets credit for incredible consistency with occasional great results from one Final Four appearance per decade.

- 28 NCAA appearances.
- Overall record of 49-27
- Five first-round losses
- Eight second-round losses
- Advanced beyond Sweet 16 only four times (This is the one that troubles me the most. SU is only 4-11 in the third round of the tournament.)

Another championship would go a long way to boosting Syracuse’s stock into the true elite. An early exit from this year’s tournament will just reinforce the stereotype.

by Orange88 on Jan 17, 2012 4:32 PM EST reply actions  

Its an inferiority complex

You have to understand CNY.

CNYer’s are a downtrodden bunch in general. They are very cynical. They will always see the glass as half empty. In fairness you can excuse some of this because of the ass kicking they and their local economy have taken over the last 30 years. But with all this comes baggage, such an inferiority complex.

So while they bitch when they see NC St. on the schedule and ask why its not UNC, and many will expect the worst when we played that ranked team like Mich St., or Florida, or fill in the blank, they will also bristle at any put down real or perceived of the team that carries their cities name.

Also, at issue are the SU students themselves, most from out of town. I think they have a bit of a inferiority complex as well. But I think their issues don’t deal totally with basketball.

I think many worry about how SU is perceived to stack up to all the other fine universities their classmates, friends, and family attended. SU may have been your sister or your friends safety school. I think some SU students transfer their issues in this area over to the sporting world. I think it is one of the big reasons so many pretend to care about lacrosse. Hey the law school is ranked 100th in the nation, but we are #1 in lacrosse!!

by NoXCUSE99 on Jan 17, 2012 5:48 PM EST reply actions  

Depends on what program you're in

A Newhouse kid, for instance, certainly isn’t going to feel ashamed of SU like an Arts and Sciences kid or a Law kid. Architecture, Information Studies, too. Newhouse is #1 and those two are top five in their fields. There are others, too.

"F***ing shocker." -Billy Wagner

by nymgb44 on Jan 17, 2012 6:23 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Or some of us actually care about Lacrosse.

I don’t know many people who were pretending to care. The student section for Lax is mostly a core group of people who really, really care.

And I don’t know anyone who had Syracuse as a safety school. Maybe I don’t come from the right area to understand this.

'Cuse 2010, Michigan 2012

by Orange22 on Jan 17, 2012 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

this nails it

i’m from CNY, and the bitter misery that seems to permeate everybody’s attitude is one of the reasons i can’t ever imagine moving back there full-time. everybody is just looking for a negative, trying to find a reason to be pessimistic or to knock somebody else’s enthusiasm down just a little bit. it’s pretty miserable.

except for SU sports…

and the NFL season before the Super Bowl, in the early 90s. ha. even the good stuff has caveats…

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Syracuse's place

Honestly, you could use Ron Morris’s flawed logic about his polling to correctly describe Syracuse’s place in this “elite” hierarchy. (Remember, Morris basically decided that there were three teams head-and-shoulders better than the competition and then a large group of strong contenders below them.)

There are a handful of truly elite programs. Based on championships, tournament performance, and yes, I guess media reputation, it’s Kansas, UNC, Duke, Kentucky, and UCLA (though they’re slumping now). They’re at the very top and will always be at the very top. Then, below them, there is a group of probably, I don’t know, 20-25 schools that are tradition-rich “basketball schools” who usually hang out near the top 10-15 in the country, get top recruits, and threaten to win a title once or twice a decade. Syracuse is one of the very top names in that second tier. Michigan State, UConn, Arizona, maybe Texas and Florida of late are some others at the TOP of this group. There is some room to rise and fall here.

If this, what we have now under Boeheim, is ALL Syracuse ever attains—a title game every 20ish years, a Final Four every decade, an occasional Sweet 16 run, and an NCAA berth in all but the very worst years, leading or nearly leading the NCAA in attendance with a truly passionate fanbase—I’m FINE with that and will happily root for Syracuse for the rest of my life. But it seems like given the success of the last 3-4 years, this program is on the verge of accomplishing more. Much more. I hope that when Boeheim does finally retire, things are as he predicted — that Syracuse Basketball is just a big machine that will keep growing.

SU can move up into that group. But it will take a lot of post-season success and a lot of time. You don’t even hear UConn mentioned with those teams, and they’ve won three titles in the last 15 years.

It's the most bullshit thing I've seen in thirty years.

by Girardi Party on Jan 17, 2012 6:06 PM EST reply actions  

it is

I don’t know if you hit on all the appropriate reasons there but as a Cuse native who went to BC for undergrad and currently lives in Boston (a thriving metropolis), the inferiority complex does exist and is understandable. Fortunately, many of the students come from elsewhere and the players no nothing about these things so the basketball program can and will overcome.

The key is to watch these games for what they are, entertainment, and not tie other emotions into how good Syracuse students are at putting a ball threw a hoop. Even if we become the Miami of college bball (damn good and badass), CNY will still have a shriveling economy and be buried under 200 in of snow.

With that said, this is the best team I’ve ever seen and Dion Waiters is D Wade reincarnated (and smaller). What up

G-Mac bitches

BC 2011

by jdguggs10 on Jan 17, 2012 6:11 PM EST reply actions  

I have no idea how anyone can watch the team they support as just entertainment.

I’m always emotionally invested. I don’t know how to be a fan any other way. And I’d guess most people around here are the same way.

Although I may be misunderstanding your meaning.

'Cuse 2010, Michigan 2012

by Orange22 on Jan 17, 2012 7:54 PM EST up reply actions  

i know what you mean

and i think it ties to the economy and general depression of the area. cuse sports are the. only. thing. there’s nothing else to talk about except how cold it is. daily life up there isn’t all that tied to world events, syracuse has a little culture but not a ton, there aren’t any pro teams less than ~3-4 hours away, and did i mention the coldness? the kinds of jobs you get up there kind of have a ceiling. i feel like the vast majority are “jobs” more than “careers”, so there isn’t a lot of that career-focused ambition that consumes people’s lives and makes sports/entertainment a secondary thing.

it is absolutely awesome to have such a huge area of people so passionate about the team, but when these young flawed immature 18-22 year olds are the only outlet for so many people… disappointment is inevitable and it can be pretty crushing and have a long-lasting effect on people’s psyches. there are millions of “fans” out there who watch a game, enjoy the highs, brush off the lows, and when it’s over, win or lose, they move on, go do whatever else they do, and a loss isn’t the end of the world. from the way i hear people talk following losses when i’m in the area, you would think an SU loss meant everybody had to give up a finger or something. that, or they’re personally insulted that the team didn’t win.

BK: This guy is on fire, he is really smokin'.
KenKo: Oh yeah, Bill? What's he smokin'?

by jlanning17 on Jan 18, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

U hit the nail on the head

You do a great job of expressing the pent up inferiority complex that SU basketball fans have. We do think we are better than what we are but deep down we know the truth, which drives our cynicism and inability to handle success. As much as I hate to compare us to Penn State, I feel they have the sane inflated vision of themselves in football. Though, I think most PSU fans are too ignorant to realize it like ’Cuse fans.

However, even if we are not an elite “one percent” program (yet), we are in the top five percent of programs. That’s still something to be proud of. And there is the hope that if we can maintain the success over

by NoEx'Cuses on Jan 17, 2012 6:33 PM EST reply actions  

Oops...

… that we’ve had the past few years and maybe get another championship, then maybe we can become an “elite” program. It will be interesting moving to the ACC because we will have to face and be measured against 2 elite teams in Duke and UNC each year. We’ll see how we do, but I think we can and will take it to.the next level. GO ORANGE!

by NoEx'Cuses on Jan 17, 2012 6:38 PM EST reply actions  

Good read

Meanwhile, I don’t think there’s any shame in only reaching the Sweet 16. It doesn’t qualify for elite status and I would love to see some more Elite 8’s and, ya know, National Titles sprinkled in there, but still Sweet 16 is solid. Orange88 above noted that Cuse is like 4-11 in Sweet 16 games…now that is totally nuts. Anyway, the way this season is going I do have to admit that getting bounced in the Sweet 16 would be a disappointment, as it was the last time the team was #1…but Arinze got hurt and… sigh

by DMF on Jan 18, 2012 7:37 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Syracuse football, basketball & lacrosse blog.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Pretty solid 2012 SU football preview
Pitt Getting Antsy
Higgins Retiring!
Best post I've read on tv money yet
Dwight Freeney Moving to OLB
Chandler Jones signs his first contract with Pats
"Florida State Killing the ACC"
Aaron Weaver signed by the Chiefs
Scoop to participate in the Knicks' first pre-draft workout
More Gloria Allred Shenanigans

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

181432_10150419917295241_697840240_17208169_5038380_n_small Sean Keeley

Editors

Hotdogangry_small Hoya Suxa

181959_1884051901099_1235420154_2201555_5066342_n_small Dan Lyons

Authors

Dome_small_small ShariCuse

Bleedingorangelogo_small FeloniousPhunk

Carmelo JohnCassillo

309758_236243686430221_100001337742137_597711_1978115663_n_small Apregs

Me_small Matt McClusky