Syracuse v. Rutgers - Student Section Impressions
As I left the Dome on Saturday, and stepped out from the Gate E overhang into the elements, a single snowflake fell onto my hand and melted. I thought I was seeing things, that my mind was still spinning from the mess of "football" that I had watched transpire during the previous four and a half hours...until someone across the stairs mentioned snow as well. Maybe I was naive for thinking that this Syracuse team could open 5-1, and could contend for a Big East championship and a BCS berth, but like the October 1st snowflakes, I was not the only one who saw that potential. The Orange had the Rutgers game in the palm of its hand for nearly four entire quarters, despite how awful the team had played for most of the game. We were a dropped interception, or an overtime fumble, or a missed field goals, or even, ironically, a botched extra point attempt from winning the game. However, it was not to be on Saturday.
I credit Rutgers for one thing. Both teams played absolutely dreadful football the entire day, at least offensively. Neither went out and proved it was the better team, or that it deserved to win. However, at the end of the day, Rutgers found a distinct advantage on special teams, specifically field goal blocking, and exploited the hell out of it. Rutgers made the plays necessary to come out on top, no matter how ugly it looked, and they escaped with a win.
The field goal issue is very disconcerting, because we have problems on a lot of levels. Our snaps are dreadfully inconsistent; the blocked extra point and the shanked field goals were both largely due to high snaps. When the snap was okay, on the blocked field goal that led to Rutgers' game tying touchdown, our blocking on the edge just failed miserably. Our special teams struggles were not limited to that unit though. The Jeremi Wilkes roughing the kicker penalty, whiled aided by some fine San San Te-esque acting by the Rutgers' punter, was a huge blow, and is something that is easily avoided. We had Shane Raupers back out there, and he punted the ball 25 yards, which is unacceptable. Our kick return unit can't block, which is wasting a lot of Jeremiah Kobena's talent, and I can't remember if Steve Rene has had a chance to return one punt this year.
I know that we want to make sure we can hang on to all of our assistants, and for good reason...I think they're all really good coaches from what I've seen at the practices I've covered over the last two spring camps. However, we need to go out and find a good, if not great, special teams coordinator. We've put the Bob Casullo era behind us, and that's fine, but this offseason I really hope Coach Marrone goes out and gets the best guy available. There is no reason that, with the game that our defense played, that we should have lost that game on Saturday, but it came down to special teams, and Rutgers dominated us in every one of those situations.
On the subject of coaching issues, Nate Hackett's playcalling is a hot topic right now, and for good reason. Many are calling for his head, and I think that is a bit unfair. He's a very young coordinator, and I think we've seen that he is capable of putting together solid gameplans. It just seems to me that he doesn't have a great feel for calling plays in every situation yet. I respect the pound the ball mentality, but the confusing thing to me on Saturday was, if we want to be a power running team, why did we try to get so fancy in the most obvious power situations? The interception in the endzone was the biggest example. I just don't get the call to throw a slant to a true freshman who has no career receptions against tight coverage. Obviously, Foster should make a catch there, but the fact that he was put in that situation is tough for a young, unproven player like that. We ran the ball pretty all day, Bailey had over 100 yards again and is on pace to break 1000 for the season, and our offensive line has been very good in run-blocking since the Rhode Island game. If you are going to throw there, why not look for Provo or Lemon, who have been solid possession guys?
I think Hackett will get better with time, but I am really hoping it is sooner rather than later.
One last coaching point...I wish we had gone for it on fourth & inches in the first overtime. I realize that we converted on the field goal, and we ended up making it to the second overtime, but going into that play, I was really worried, mostly because of how bad our field goal unit had been all game. I had a lot more faith in us getting six-inches on a run, especially since Antwon was running very well in overtime, than us successfully blocking the Rutgers rush, and getting a good snap. They proved me wrong, but I still think it would've been the right move.
More impressions after the jump...
Ryan Nassib had a bad game, but I think he's built up enough slack to where we can retain our faith in him. As mediocre as Rutgers is, most of that is because their offense is dreadful. Their defense is actually pretty decent, and schemed well for us. It seemed like they were afraid of letting Nassib hurt them on roll-outs, where he has been very effective throwing the ball, so they tried to contain him within the pocket, and it worked. Nassib didn't look comfortable at all.
The fumbles not withstanding, Antwon ran really well on Saturday. If we're going to insist on giving Jerome Smith carries, I hope we start to increase that load. Running backs need to get into a rhythm, and that's impossible if they're only getting three carries. Instead of pounding Antwon up the middle to start every drive, let's let Smith get in there and give the defense some different looks. I also look forward to seeing more of Steve Rene, who has been very dynamic in the practices I've seen. I don't think he'll ever get too many carries, but he can definitely be dangerous catching the ball out of the back field on screens, and lining up in the slot.
As for Adonis Ameen-Moore, at this point I just hope we redshirt him. I want four full seasons out of the big guy.
Where art thou, Adrian Flemming? He's really tall, can jump, and has great hands. If we're looking for a big receiver, I'm surprised we're looking at Kyle Foster as opposed to him.
i credit the offensive line, they've really gelled over the last three weeks. We still struggle to get a push in the middle, especially in short yardage situations, but our pass blocking and general run blocking have been a lot better than they were in weeks one and two. Hopefully they continue to progress.
The defense was just awesome all day. We got more pressure on the quarterback than we have all year, especially from the defensive ends. Mikhail had by far his best game of the season, he'd been pretty quiet up to this point. Our linebackers are going to be a special unit for a while. We already know that Dyshawn Davis is a bad, bad man from that hit he laid in the first quarter, but Marquis Spruill, Cam Lynch, and Dan Vaughan have all been very solid all season. Even Dom Anene has done a great job out there when he's been thrust in to action. The unit that impressed me the most on Saturday, however, was the secondary. Holding Sanu to seven catches and 65 yards, and only the one touchdown which was on a blown assignment (he was being covered by Deon Goggins...that isn't good) is a success. Keon Lyn and Ri'Shard Anderson, who have been really banged up all season, were tremendous all day long, and Phil Thomas had another good game, despite the dropped pick, which is probably the only knock you can make against the defense from last week.
It was an ugly loss, but I think the fact that we have Tulane this week is a godsend. Tulane is really, really bad. I hope that this will be a take-two for the Rhode Island game, where we can jump ahead big and get some back-ups some playing time. However, you never know with this team.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Im curious at this point
isnt re-shirting time rapidly about to pass us by, in reference to AAM?
All the rest, you pretty much nailed it Dan. Lets go get Tulane.
A formal red-shirt declaration isn’t needed, is this what you mean? Otherwise I agree, at this point save his eligibility.
As long as he doesnt have any on field time
you can retroactively red shirt the player?
I am unsure about how that works. I thought it would have to be some type of formality by the coach and NCAA/Big East?
haha OK
So if they dont see the field for the year, that year can be retroactively given as a red shirt to allow the person 4 full years of eligibility?
OK gotcha
Thats different than the NCAA rules for basketball then right? If I recall, a basketball player can actually play for a certain amount of time in the season, and if they get injured before said time, they can redshirt the year.
so with football redhsirt rules if they dont see the field (DNP) and havent already gotten a medical redshirt, they can still use that year? Does this take them out of contention later for a medical redshirt? Kind of curious about that. I know in football there are more 6-year players than any other sport given the nature of the D1 game (more injuries, players many times don’t play their first year on the team)
Sorry for all the questions, but I figure this would be the best place to ask them. Im not up on all the red-shirt rules, and they seem like they change with some regularity.
Generally, they do lose the eligibility for a medical redshirt, but it’s really a judgment call by the NCAA as to who gets a 6th year and who doesn’t, it is rare though.
I think the medical redshirt rule is that they have to play in less than 30% of the games. PTG has now played in more than that, for example, so he can’t redshirt this year.
Yea
There was a story somewhere where Marrone was talking about it. They like to wait several seasons then give the player the option to take their redshirt year if they would like, graduate, or draft. But apparently as long as the time on the field translates you can hold it.
does it mean I'm a racist
that when San San Te missed that first field goal I fist pumped and shouted “Fuck Fuck You”?
CNN's top 120
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/120/index2
19 AQ teams below us. Remember the G-Rob era? We’d have one or two teams behind us.
Dictated, but not read.
That being said
Rutgers at 29? That should be us. We just wasted a mega-huge opportunity for national respect. 5-1 and we are “others getting votes.”
Dictated, but not read.
That just proves
that these ass wipe media people don’t pay attention and have no fucking clue. Anyone who thinks Rutgers is the 29th best team in the country is so high they should be in orbit. As for 5-1 putting SU in the “others getting votes” category? Yeah, nice thought, and it might have happened, but even if this team were 5-1, based on what I’ve seen so far, I’m not sure I’d buy it.
We will not rest until we see these capitalist octopuses annihilated.
-Che Marrone
Because rankings...
…“compiled by his own personal mathematical computer formula” are so legit. My 1979 Mets Strat-0-Matic team used to win on my dining room table, too. Therefore, they should have been better than the Pirates that year. Really.
That was the game to play Adonis.
I don’t care if he didn’t play the first four games. The Big East games are the most important and withou Gulley were gonna need him. How many times have we not converted on 3rd and 2 or less? Sorry Doug but you play to win now and we need his power.
Syracuse '13
No way
You don’t throw a guy with no game experience into an important situation like that.
I mean, other than emptying the backfield to throw a five yard slant to Kyle Foster. That would be perfectly acceptable.
Dictated, but not read.
I agree with not putting him in OT without any experience
But I think he should have been playing all game, and if was doing fine, then give it to him. We need a 2nd back besides Gulley, and I rather have Adonis than Smith.
Syracuse '13
by OrangeCrush13 on Oct 3, 2011 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I thougt Dave Rahme
of the Post Standard said somewhere that AAM’s weight was creeping back up. Maybe he is not really ready to play this year.
The 4th and 1
My stepfather, who was at the game, had the same thought as you, Dan. Obviously, we’ll never know if it was the right call, but I think there would be a lot less second-guessing, if Bailey doesn’t fumble in Double OT.
My thinking at the time: even though Macky has been getting better, he/we really struggle to get any kind of push in the center, so it’s tough to QB sneak it, which means we have to hand the ball off, and for all of Bailey’s abilities, running north/south and moving the pile is not one of them. So I think Marrone thought, we can’t sneak it, we can’t hand it off to Bailey, am I really going to give the ball to a Freshman RB? No, kick the FG, get to be on defense 1st in the second OT, hold them to a FG, then win the game. And we did everything but win the game.
For real-time 'Cuse banter, check me out at: http://twitter.com/#!/TeabagDunk
yep
In general, I think we need to run Harris a lot more. He’s a big back and big backs that run through folks rather than between them are the best way to wear out a defense. Get ’em tuckered out and make things easier on Bailey.

by 


































