Why I think 2010 will be a Turnaround Season for SU Football, part 2
This is my message and I will shout it from every hilltop until this SU team proves me wrong: SU will be bowl-bound in 2010.I get that there are the nay-sayers out there who'll point out that there's always some nutbag that predicts SU will miraculously go 9-3 or 10-2 or 12-0 prior to every season. But I'm not that kind of nutbag, I'm the more reasonable kind with a few cashews and raisins mixed in. So here's a few more nuggets of wisdom to chew on as we gear up for this glorious thing we call summer training camp in a few weeks:
(Note to any rookies out there...brevity is not my strong suit)
7-5 in 2010 is not that much better than 4-8 in 2009: As ridiculous as that statement may sound at face value, lets break this thing down. Last season, SU beat 2 teams they should have (Akron, Maine) and lost to one team they shouldn't have (L'ville). By those same lines, I am going to assume SU will beat Akron, Maine and Colgate this year, and for the record, I will ALWAYS assume SU would beat these teams in any given season. If you can't roll with me on that, stop reading this, and please, stop rooting for SU (If Doug Marrone loses to Akron so help me I will be just as incensed as when Greggers did it in 2008...I don't care that its @ Akron this year and its the first game of the season. Folks, its f***ing Akron!). Since L'ville is a home game this year, I just don't see Charlie Strong taking his team into the Dome and stealing that one from us like they did last year. He might be a better coach than Kragthorpe, but I'm not giving him that much credit to beat us on our turf in his first year. So theres 4 wins right there.
Now, if SU is good for 2 wins over bowl teams at home in 2009 (Rutgers, N'western), I'm going to say the same for 2010. That's why I'm picking SU to take the UConn and BC games at the end of the season. No matter how well SU plays in 2010, I expect them to give both of these teams 60 minutes of pure hell, especially if SU's bowl hopes are still alive at this point. Homefield advantage is huge for these games as well.
Looking at the remaining 6 games- @ UW, @ USF, Pitt, @ WVU, @ Cincy and @ Rutgers, each one of those is a winnable game. I'm going to say SU will catch one team napping, and my pick is USF. Chances are also good that SU will play tough in most of these games, but expect a couple losses that shoulda-coulda-woulda been wins, kind of like we saw during the Minnesota, USF and L'ville games in 2009. Also, on the negative side, SU was 0-4 on the road in 2009, so don't be surprised to see a couple of all-out ass kickings away from the Dome either. And when you considering all of these factors discussed, if SU only manages to go 5-7 or 6-6, I really don't see that as an improvement over last season. This all might seem like an unreasonably high expectation, but I assure you, Doug Marrone's are much higher.
The Defense: As much as I believe Doug Marrone will get the offense clicking in 2010, much like he did to close out the season vs Rutgers and UConn in 2009, the defense is what will turn SU into a winning team this year. The defense that Shafer put together last season was the type I was expecting to see out of Greggers way back in 2005 (y'know, before we realized he was an imbecile). There are plenty of proven playmakers, so I look for the defense to improve over 2009 and will give Ryan Nassib and the offense more chances to put points on the board. My only real concern is depth at linebacker, but based upon the productivity from the 2009 recruiting class, my guess is that there'll be a couple of freshmen studs ready to step up.
In addition, as much of a believer I am in Doug Marrone, I am equally a believer in Scott Shafer. I think Doug realized he didn't have to worry about his defense with Shafer running things, therefore he could direct most of his attention towards righting the offensive woes thus naming himself OC. Given that is was Doug Marrones offense that won a Superbowl for the Saints, I think we're in for good things in the future. It will take some time, but for now, its the defense that will carry the load for the team, which is a job that they'll be well equipped to do.
Player Turnover and Recruiting: Now that we're in year two, I think we're to the point where all of that turmoil and player turnover from last season is behind us, not only to the point where is stops hurting the team but it actually works to SU's advantage. For now, it appears that Doug Marrone has cut out all the dead weight, allowing him to bring in the players he wants. I'll take the 31 newbies Doug Marrone reeled in over a roster full of the oafs he ran outta town. I still won't be surprised to see some of these guys pull a Shane Raupers or JohnMark Henderson, but based upon the precedent set by the 2009 class, there's sure to be some guys that fit the mold and will be ready to play. Any one of the recruits at linebacker could see instant playing time, for example. On offense, I'm expecting to see something from the TEs, not to mention which WR wants to be the next Alec Lemon. My sleeper pick for this class is Tyson Gulley. My guess is we'll see him fall in line behind Collier and Bailey, but expect him to get some solid time on special teams, which I think will also be vastly improved (we can't do too much worse on coverage teams, right?).
Anyways, just my .02 while we trudge through another week of summer. Though I despise EA Sports, I hope you all are enjoying your NCAA 2011. And by that I mean I hope over the last week SU has won the national championship at least 2,104 times and Ryan Nassib has collected 1,456 Heisman trophies. And it goes without saying I'm sure Rutgers has been beaten a combined score of 75,942 - 0. But I digress....
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hell to the yeah
Preach the gospel, brother! I think it is plausible for the very reasons you outlined. There is one huge question mark in my mind, though, and that is Ryan Nassib. He looked very promising in limited action last year, but I wonder if he is good enough to maintain that kind of production in an expanded role. I think the reps he got last year will pay off dividends this year (which is why Marrone gave him the reps in the first place, I’m sure), and I think he’ll be good. But a lot hinges on his development.
"(BARF)" - Donovan McNabb, during his game winning drive against Virginia Tech in 1998
I'm counting on Ryan to not suck balls
I think the defense should be good enough help take the pressure off the offense, which is a huge asset when breaking in a new QB. Also, he’ll get a couple lay-ups early, which should help build his confidence. I was not so sure about the Paulus experiment going into last year, but it had the HCDM seal of approval and it turned out a’ight. Competition should be intense for the position during camp, and whoever Doug gives the nod to should be good to go. I’m assuming it’ll be Nassib because of his experience and based upon what we’ve already seen. If someone comes along and knocks him off his pedestal (again), I think we’ll be in for a treat.
Also, I did not see the spring game, but I understand the offense looked good, which is kind of surprising. If the offense develops quicker than I’m thinking it will….well, let’s not even go there.
"I'm going through a rough patch in my life right now. Syracuse is 0 and 3" - Adam Sandler
by bloodyyank44 on Jul 19, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
It's hard to not be excited....
…but we’ve been wandering the football wilderness for so long that it’s hard to blame us.
"(BARF)" - Donovan McNabb, during his game winning drive against Virginia Tech in 1998
I drink the Kool Aid every year.....
and why not. We’re fans, thats what we do. I know its cliche, but if Nassib can be “serviceable” we’ll win 7 games this year. Come on September!!!
I have high hopes for Nassib as well
But, its the OL that has mean the most concerned. I am worried Nassib won’t have the time to make the “right” decisions and be forced to rush things even when he doesn’t have to (like what happened to Paulus by the end of the year).
Hell, I was excited when Marrone got SU off of the “Bottom 10” list on ESPN. This whole bowl talk thing is still a little foreign to me. :)
Go Orange(men)!
believe it or not
I’m not worried about the OL this year. Doug did a good job whipping them into shape, barely resembling the lumps that they were under Greggers. There’s a core of talent, size and experience there between Bartholomew, Rosner and Tiller, not to mention I think JCs Alexander and Hay will contribute right away, if not start. The question (as always) will be depth.
I think you hit on something key there though. Greg forced some throws even when the OL gave him the time he needed to make a good decision. Nassib has shown he has a strong, accurate arm and can make good decisions. We’ll see how that translates into 2010.
"I'm going through a rough patch in my life right now. Syracuse is 0 and 3" - Adam Sandler
by bloodyyank44 on Jul 20, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, poor Greg
he was hearing footsteps when they weren’t even there. However, given his protection in the first 6 games, I can’t blame him. It certainly caused him to have “happy feet” in the pocket, which is never good.
I will say, the line did improve in the second half of the season, and hopefully it translates more this season as you suggested.
Again, we will learn a LOT about how good Marrone is as a coach this year. The OL might be one of those settling points.
Go Orange(men)!
not to mention Greg was tiny by college qb standards…hopefully some of his leadership qualities rubbed off on Ryan. I was impressed with what I saw from Ryan last year to have some confidence in him this year. He still has a lot to learn though.
by OrangeBlood44 on Jul 21, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions
The difference with Marrone
is that we go into every game thinking that—perhaps—he will come up with a game plan to make things interesting.
But I don’t make predictions. What’s the point? Injuries. Weather. Suspensions. Defections. All kinds of variables.
If there are five injuries in the Akron game and we lose… what are you going to do? It happens to teams every year. We lost Bill Hurley in Game 1 in the 1970’s. Injuries happen. Not to mention that Akron is a coaching staff that is intimately familiar with us… a head coach from Notre Dame (who has played us recently) and a bevy of former SU coaches.
Suppose we win. Which I agree we should “on paper.” What if Locker does a Bradford and does not survive Game 1? What if he just gets dinged up and they do an Iowa and rest him? We can stun U.W., right? If we go 4-0… why not 8-9 wins? When is the last time a Syracuse football team had confidence?
Predictions are fun and all, but they just lead people to disappointment. We could lose to Akron and Louisville and go 10-2.
For now… it’s a one game season: Akron. The most important game of the season is Akron. The difference between 1-0 and 0-1 is infinite.
Also... case in point
The year we beat Nebraska… we were shut out by Rutgers the week before.
Each week is a new season unto itself.
If I am Marrone and the team, my goal is 12-0. One game at a time.
All true
And you seem to share a key point in the belief of Marrone that I have – preparation. You know that the guy and his staff are working their tails off during the week to at least have a plan of attack. That’s absolutely how we beat Rutgers last year – and it was nice to see the plan (rattle the hell out of a frosh QB by blitzing constantly) pay off. With GRob, his plan consisted of yelling and jumping around a lot. You can tell that at least Marrone takes the job seriously.
Will that lead to a bowl berth? Who knows. As you pointed out, the most important game is always the next one. I expect them to be getting ready for Akron as we speak.
"(BARF)" - Donovan McNabb, during his game winning drive against Virginia Tech in 1998
by kotite4ever on Jul 20, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
you're right
All I’m saying about Akron is it’s unnaccepable to lose to them. Period. I’m all for HCDM, but he’s also accountable each week and doesn’t get a free pass just because he had to clean up Greggers mess. I get that upsets happen every week. But for as horrendous a situation as Doug walked into last year, the new coaching staff at Akron has it 10 times worse. If SU isn’t 1-0 going into UW I’m going to be livid. A loss to them would be a devastating blow to the rebuilding process.
I get what you mean about Akron’s coaching staff being familiar with SU too. The thing is, the opposite is true. Also, SU is much different from the team that Ianello saw in 2008 at ND, and the others before that. The real question should be, how familiar are Akrons coaches with Doug Marrone and Scott Shafer?
Like kotite said, I think Doug is gameplanning as we speak. He knows how big this game is and isn’t going to let his team think for a second that all they have to do to win is show up in any game. As for my predictions, its just a fun exercise to kill time during the summer dead season, but I’m sticking to them. SU will have a good chance at beating any team on the schedule this year, which is all the more reason to get excited.
"I'm going through a rough patch in my life right now. Syracuse is 0 and 3" - Adam Sandler
by bloodyyank44 on Jul 20, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
And as far as that goes
Doug should have an easy time making sure the kids don’t look past anyone. All he has to do is point out to them, “Hey, you guys have sucked for the last five years. And Akron beat us at home two years ago. Now let’s go to Ohio and take care of business.”
"(BARF)" - Donovan McNabb, during his game winning drive against Virginia Tech in 1998
For now… it’s a one game season: Akron. The most important game of the season is Akron. The difference between 1-0 and 0-1 is infinite
That made me chuckle :)
-1 for incorrect math humor
The difference isn’t infinite. 1-0 is infinitely times as many wins as 0-1, though.
/math geek
That's what I was getting at
100% is infinitely better than 0% type of thing. I actually missed the “difference as in -” reference when I first posted it. :(
Go Orange(men)!
I really shouldn't be busting anyone chops for making a math joke anyway
I don’t want to discourage the practice, you know. (-:

by 















