Syracuse 13 - Rutgers 10: See You At Our Bowl Game
Syracuse football is going to a bowl game in 2010. I'm sure you've heard by now, we haven't been to one since 2004. It's kindof our thing. Well, it WAS our thing. In Year Two of the Doug Marrone Era, slightly ahead of schedule, the Syracuse Orange football team will finish the season with more wins than losses and will play a football game in mid-to-late December.
Take a step for a second and think about it. Wow.
As not only a fan of Syracuse football but as a proponent of the Syracuse-Rutgers rivalry, I can think of no better way to do it than how it happened on Saturday. Not only did the Orange beat the Knights in their own house to officially remake the program as a winner, they did it in a fashion that broke the heart of Scarlet Nation, chopped those hearts up into tiny strips, rendered the fat, dipped them in panko bread crumbs, placed them on top of a sandwich that also included mozzarella sticks, french fries, lettuce, tomato and mayonnaise and called it The Fat Orange.
First off, let's appreciate how the game ended, courtesy of former Rutgers recruit and New Jersey's own Ross "Das Boot" Krautman:
Ironically, the 11-play, 66-yard march that ended with a 24-yard field goal by freshman Ross Krautman, a New Jersey native, started at the Orange 27-yard line following a missed field goal try by Rutgers junior San San Te.
Krautman’s kick, with 1:07 left to play, gave SU a 13-10 victory over its neighboring-state rival, the Rutgers Scarlet Knights in front of 49,911 fans.
Second, let's not go any further until we flip that ish...
By no means was this a pretty win. In fact, it was downright ugly and had the Orange lost, we would be bemoaning dozens of things that didn't work all day. But we did win, so we'll let a lot of it slide. The defense has their hands full and were unable to put their hands on Rutgers' running backs all day. The pesky Scarletcat formation wreaked havoc against the Orange line that was already reeling from the mysterious absence of Bud Tribbey. That they gave up tons of yards (190) to running backs that aren't even starters is cause for concern. Still, concern is something for Mondays.
And besides, look at what the defense did in the final minutes when it mattered most. The Orange D clamped down and pushed the Rutgers offense back just far enough that their last-gasp field goal attempt fell short. Had they been ten yards closer...who knows...
One of the crazier parts of the Syracuse football story this season...their road dominance. The Orange clinched their fourth Big East win on Saturday and it was also their fifth road win on the season. It's the first time since all the way back in 1991 that they've accomplished that in conference. I don't know if Doug Marrone's "we play better away from all the distractions" theory is what its about, but, whatever it is, it's working.
This win was so crucial for so many reasons...
- It clears away that ominous "one more win for bowl eligibility" cloud hanging over the team's head until they did it.
- It's SU's second-straight win over Rutgers and it's the series' first fantastic finish in years, strengthening the budding rivalry.
- It's a massive signal to all NYC/NJ recruits deciding between Syracuse and Rutgers to recognize the direction the Orange are moving in.
- It basically means that, at worst, the Orange will play in the Pinstripe Bowl.
And so, when the Orange host the UConn Huskies this Saturday, the game will have implications that were previously unheard-of. Both teams still have a possible shot in the ever-changing Big East title picture. The Orange are playing for bowl placement and the Huskies are playing for bowl eligibility. With the way last season's game finished and the emergence of another rivalry here, expect this game to be Billy Fucillo HUGE for both squads.
It's nice to be playing football in late November with purpose again. Good work, Coach Marrone. You have earned whatever national praise is coming your way. More importantly, you have earned the praise and respect of every Orange fan out there. Great f**king job, bro.
SU-Rutgers Recap: The Sunny Side...Brent Axe
SU-Rutgers Recap: The Dark Side...Brent Axe
SU-Rutgers Recap: This, That, and The Other Thing...Brent Axe
Marcus Sales surfaces at critical juncture for Syracuse University football team...Dave Rahme
GOING BOWLING: SU becomes bowl eligible thanks to Krautman's game-winning kick in win over Rutgers...Daily Orange
FizzCast: Rutgers Win Makes Syracuse Bowl-Bound...Orange Fizz
Start spreadin' the news...Three Idiots on Sports
YES WE CAN!! (Syracuse Is Going Bowling!)...Cuse Connection
Bowl Eligible And It Feels So Good...Otto's Army
Bowl hopes dim for Rutgers after 13-10 loss...On The Banks
What we learned in the Big East: Week 11: Hello, Orange bowl...Brian Bennett
Morning Coffee! Syracuse Can Go Bowling...SB Nation NY
Rutgers honors Eric LeGrand...ESPN
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Doug Marrone now has more wins in less than two seasons at Syracuse (11) than Greg Robinson had in four seasons (10)."
I’ll just let that speak for itself on the direction of our program.
by Doc Gross's Phones on Nov 14, 2010 5:36 PM EST reply actions
Looks like our train
finally stopped talking about whether it could… and just put on cleats and eye black… and did.
Orange roll…..take them one at a time……why not 9-3……and beyond….can anybody say Syracuse over USC next September?
Why not?
I’d LOVE to beat the University of Second Choice. Or any west coast school for that matter.
Scheduled for
the AM
Troy Nunes Is An Absolute Magician - The Syracuse blog that cares.
Buy my book "How To Grow An Orange"
PS
Cuse is once again the Big East’s Highest Ranked team – #33.
Wonderful year, excited to see SU in a bowl again
My prediction is the Pinstripe Bowl, makes since with it being close to Syracuse and all the SU alums in the NYC area. Apparently, in the Post Standard they said there is a possibility Notre Dame could play in that bowl if they get eligible.
by upstateNYYFan1984 on Nov 14, 2010 7:17 PM EST reply actions
question
suppose Syracuse Pitt and West Va all end 5-2 with West Va beating Pitt….since Syracuse lost to Pitt but beat West Va….who gets the BCS bid?
The team
that has the highest BCS rank is the one who goes to the BCS game.
by Gregory Tuers on Nov 14, 2010 8:36 PM EST up reply actions
Syracuse would go to the BCS in that scenario
The first applicable tiebreaker would be overall wins which Syracuse and WV would have nine each (hopefully). Then based on the head-to-head SU would get the bid. There’s still a few things that would have to happen, but it’s exciting to thing of the progress in just two years!
not entirely true
Under that scenario
Pitt over Syracuse
Syracuse over WVU
WVU over Pitt
Therefore at 5-2 there are no tiebreakers. It would go to BCS standings.
Also, USF isn’t out of it yet either. If USF beats Pitt, Pitt wins the rest, and SU beats UConn, there’s another 3 way tie that would go to the BCS standings. With USF playing @Miami, that could give them a boost in the BCS standings over us and Pitt. Therefore, BC actually might mean something even though it doesn’t count in the Big East standings.
its about time someone videotaped the flippin of the banner
for us out of towners
Visit The Cuse Connection. The Newest Syracuse University Athletics Blog at http://www.CuseConnection.com
Is that a joke?
It’s been posted on this site after every Big East win this year. Where ya been?
ha celebrating i guess
i haven’t seen any videos of the flip.. i’ve seen pictures not videos tho.. i gotta wake up! Clearly not bringing my A game
Visit The Cuse Connection. The Newest Syracuse University Athletics Blog at http://www.CuseConnection.com
Okay, defense is STILL weak against a heavy formation
lllvlll unfortunately exposed the undermanned defense in that way, so RU did they only play(s) (I counted only two variants of the same play) they had in the arsenal that mimicked lllvlll’s power running game, bring in 7 OLs.
The defense made the stop in the end because RU couldn’t afford to run their only successful play(s) with that amount of time left, luckily. Power running, great for controlling a game, lousy for rallying to win.
SU’s OL is STILL the glaring weak spot on that team, it kills me watching Nassib get the Paulus happy-feet in the pocket cause he has no clue when he is going to get clobbered.
All that said, I am so proud to see SU make it to a bowl, and given how under-manned they are, they have played TREMENDOUS ball. Props boys, you earned it, now win out so you can go to the best bowl you can (hopefully Champs Sports Bowl, cause they might win it & so I can be there)
Go Orange(men)!
Defense only gave up 10 points
I don’t think any side of the ball really looked great today but to be fair to the defense, they held Rutgers to one TD and one FG, that is not too bad at all and would look better if the offense put more points on the board as well.
by Orange Chuck on Nov 15, 2010 6:39 AM EST up reply actions
Assuming you don't count both missed field goals
RU had over 200 yards rushing (39 yards were counted as negative rushing despite being sacks). There is a clear hole in the D versus power formations. I don’t think the D sucks, far from it, they are playing WAY over their heads for being so out-manned half the time. It is solely a problem with # of recruits on the team, that’s all. A problem that will be rectified next couple of years.
Go Orange(men)!
Heh
I love that the “On the Banks” blogger gives Syracuse no credit at all for yesterday’s win. Has anyone read that post? It’s…unreal.
"(BARF)" - Donovan McNabb, during his game winning drive against Virginia Tech in 1998
Well
You give a douchebag a computer, and the douchebaggery will reveal itself on the Internet. What did we expect???
I recall that Rutgers went 11-0 one year
Check out the schedule:
1976-Rutgers (Independent)
9/11 @ Navy (4-7) W 13 3
9/18 @ Bucknell (non-IA) W 19 7
9/25 @ Princeton (2-7) W 17 0
10/2 vs. Cornell (2-7) W 21 14
10/9 vs. Connecticut (non-IA) W 38 0
10/16 @ Lehigh (non-IA) W 28 21
10/23 vs. Columbia (3-6) W 47 0 @ East Rutherford, NJ
10/30 vs. Massachusetts (non-IA) W 24 7
11/6 vs. Louisville (4-7) W 34 0
11/13 @ Tulane (2-9) W 29 20
11/18 vs. Colgate (8-2) W 17 9 @ East Rutherford, NJ
4 lower division team PLUS Colgate, Columbia, Princeton, and Cornell.
What a joke. If Rutgers wants respect, go ahead and start scheduling TWO BCS-conference teams. Yep… takes some BALLS do that.
Frauds.
By comparison.... OUR 1977 schedule
1977-Syracuse (Independent)
9/10 @ Oregon State (2-9) L 12 24
9/17 vs. North Carolina State (8-4) L 0 38
9/24 vs. Washington (8-4) W 22 20
10/1 @ Illinois (3-8) W 30 20
10/8 @ Maryland (8-4) L 10 24
10/15 vs. Penn State (11-1) L 24 31
10/22 @ Pittsburgh (9-2-1) L 21 28
10/29 vs. Virginia (1-9-1) W 6 3
11/5 @ Navy (5-6) W 45 34
11/12 vs. Boston College (6-5) W 20 3
11/19 vs. West Virginia (5-6) W 28 9
6-5-0
218 234
Not yet.
I think the majority of pageviews that blog gets is from SU fans.
that blog gets ZERO traffic.....
seriously, I started following it about two weeks ago, each blog post/column/article gets at most 2 or 3 comments.
by OrangeinJersey on Nov 15, 2010 9:27 AM EST up reply actions
you can't tell site traffic by comments really
but when you make a game thread and there are only 2 posts, its pretty pathetic. especially when one of them was from a syracuse fan!
Visit The Cuse Connection. The Newest Syracuse University Athletics Blog at http://www.CuseConnection.com
hey sean
are you going to the bowl game no matter which one it is?
Can't promise
but if its Pinstripe, that’s a lot easier to do. And I feel like I would have to go Beef if we went. And BCS…obviously…
The others, not sure. Especially the Birmingham one…I don’t think the players will even show up for that…
Troy Nunes Is An Absolute Magician - The Syracuse blog that cares.
Buy my book "How To Grow An Orange"
by Sean Keeley on Nov 15, 2010 12:53 AM EST up reply actions
NY Post article comments...
Check out the NY Post story linked above…someone commented about SU’s schedule…
Well, that person happened to mention New Hampshire…I’d suggest Rutgers not schedule New Hampshire again! This is what happened last time:
<a href=“http:// ”http://www.unhwildcats.com/sports/fball/2004-05/releases/archivepage.cfm-pid=5F958F89-BDB7-0F43-A7374610189F48A1.htm" target="_blank">http://www.unhwildcats.com/sports/fball/2004-05/releases/archivepage.cfm-pid=5F958F89-BDB7-0F43-A7374610189F48A1.htm" >
http://www.unhwildcats.com/sports/fball/2004-05/releases/archivepage.cfm-pid=5F958F89-BDB7-0F43-A7374610189F48A1.htm
Go Orange.
I think the defense's struggles against the run were part of the plan
when they ran the wild cat, the “QB” (usually Sunu or #18) he always kept the ball. They made plays, lke 8-10 yd runs every now and then, but those dudes got wrecked. #18 went down at least twice and at one pointSunu was practically cut in half by Smith and he stayed down and didn’t come back for a while. by the end of the game those guys didn’t have anything left in the tank.
by Rocket Ship Science on Nov 15, 2010 10:56 AM EST reply actions

by 

































