Troy Nunes Is An Absolute Magician: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Defend That, Digger! The Overrated/underrated edition

Begun, The Cuse Blog Wars Have

 4. Syracuse is in a unique position in the Big East: their fans still crave a winning football team, but Syracuse has been on top of the basketball food chain for a long time. Does the status quo of the Big East, with a crowded 16-team basketball conference, and the football programs on shaky ground, work for Syracuse athletics? Did the Big East make a mistake in promoting John Marinatto to replace the retiring Mike Tranghese, instead of bringing in an outsider with more of a football background?

I’ll let you in on the dark, dirty secret that Syracuse fans don’t want you to know…

We’d trade the basketball program’s success for football success in a heartbeat.

Don’t get me wrong, we don’t take Jim Boeheim and his fantastic teams for granted.  We love us some SU basketball and we live and die by their success (or lack thereof).  But Syracuse, NY is in Upstate New York…Football Country.  And in the 50’s and early 60’s, Syracuse Football was the shit long before Syracuse Basketball really became the consistent winner it is these days.

The question was courtesy of Rutgers blog Bleed Scarlet and the answer was mine.  I do believe what I said.  I don't mean to devalue what SU basketball means to Syracuse fans and alums.  It is the great, shining beacon of success that we point to any time we want to feel good about our place in the college sports world.  You wouldn't trade the last 30 years that Syracuse basketball has enjoyed with any program in the country, save for a handful.

But I do believe that Syracuse fans crave football success.  They crave it like Scoop Jardine craves free cheesesteaks.  They crave it like Mikhail Marinovich craves apple-scented tobacco.  They crave it like Jim Calhoun craves the souls of babies. 

Yes, SU football attendance is abysmal but so would SU basketball's if they were this bad.  If SU football was a consistent nationally-ranked program as it should be, the Dome would be packed solid all the time.  SU fans reject the idea that this is the fate of our football program, that we won't be able to compete on a northeastern, let alone national level again.  That's pinko Commie talk.

Then again this is all just my opinion.  Personally, I'm more of a football fan than a basketball fan so maybe I'm biased.  And maybe I'm taking the basketball program for granted.  But I just have to believe that the people of the Greater Syracuse Area want football success so bad, they would sacrifice some of our basketball success to get it.

Josh over at Cuse Country disagrees.

My bet would be that missing the NCAA tournament the last two years bothers the average local fan more than the football team’s recent issues.

It's an interesting topic starter for any Syracuse fan (hence the poll below).  What's worse?  The disaster that is SU Football or missing the NCAA Tourney that last two years?  Josh is a life-long local, which I can't claim to be, so maybe that gives him a different outlook on things as well. 

Josh also takes issue with comments Bleed Scarlet's Jon made about the Big East conference and the football school/basketball school dilemma that's rearing its ugly head lately. Specifically since the selection of John Marinatto as the new commish signals that the 16-team basketball behemoth will continue to take precedent over it's 8-team football counterpart.

It's the classic traditionalist/progressive argument that has driven and will continue to drive Big East discussion for years.  Should we stick to our roots and nuture the Providence's and St. John's of the conference forever more or should we look towards securing the future of the conference by creating relationships with evolving programs that make up for their lack of history with a commitment to winning now and in the future?  I happen to be more of a progressive in these matters but I can't fault anyone who wants to defend the tradition of the conference. 

Josh, I personally disagree on the matter but I respect your opinions and the reasoning behind them.  I say you start walking West, I'll start walking East, I'll meet you somewhere around St. Louis, we'll shake, take a ride up the Arch, share a moment and then return to our coasts.

That, or we can settle this the old fashioned way:


 

Poll
Which has bothered you more as an SU fan?
The Greg Robinson Era
160 votes
SU BB's lack of recent NCAA Tournament appearances
105 votes

265 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

It's clearly GRob...

… but that’s mostly because SU missing the NCAAs has been such a close-run thing (and one that wouldn’t have happened to the #3, #4 or #5 school in an all-sports Big East); the Orange have been out mostly because the committee is reluctant to select nine or ten teams from one conference, even though have no problem taking 7 from 12-team conferences or 6 from 10/11 team conferences when merited.

by drothgery on Nov 17, 2008 3:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'd gladly meet you in St. Louis, but...

…those little tram cars you take up to the top of the arch are a bit tight. You might have to buy me a drink first. Then we can hitch a ride to Kansas City for the CBE.

Or, how about we settle it the new old-fashioned way instead.

by SyraJosh on Nov 17, 2008 4:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i'm a basketball guy

As embarrassing and painful as the football program has been, the last 2 years of missing the NCAA tournament combined with the 2 years before that of losing in the first round of the NCAAs, has been more painful than anything football can throw at us. But I am also much more of a basketball guy and always have been, even when Syracuse had a good football team. And maybe I’ve become numb to the football team’s failures. Not that I don’t expect more someday, I just don’t expect much right now.

Here’s another thought: Even though the Big East has been underrated in football for a long time, I still don’t think it’s ever been a diehard football conference. SU may have a rich football history, but I think a lot of that occurred unrelated to the Big East. And what in-conference rivalries do we have? Is there any football rivalry that comes even close to comparing with our basketball rivalries?

by voteprime on Nov 17, 2008 4:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

failure on the court hurts more because that's where we make our reputation

I’m a partisan voice in this debate, since Josh is a co-contributor of mine, and we have a similar background (born and raised in Syracuse, 18 years, then left town for school and never went back). But the reason I care more about basketball is because on a national scale its what has always (in my life) given Syracuse its stature and significance. The years we’ve had good football teams have been gravy, but football comes and goes. The basketball team makes us who we are, drives all the rivalries, gives us our national press, and otherwise keeps SU on the map. Without basketball we’re a regional program that no one cares about. I have wonderful memories of Donnie McPherson, Marvin Graves, the Donovan and Marvin Harrison show, and my man Dwight Freeney. But only a few times in my life has SU football made noise on a national level. Whereas in basketball we are privileged to expect to at least “make noise” on a national level basically every year.

It goes back to the rivalries as well, and the day to day pain of losing to UConn or Georgetown or whoever. So much is invested in hating those guys, whereas the pain is not nearly as acute in football. I used to have a passionate hatred of the Miami Hurricanes in football that matched the intensity of my desire to win in basketball, but the ACC fucked all that up, and nothing has replaced it. It’s about the pain/reward ratio. SU basketball has dished out so much joy in the last 30 years that you can expect a great deal of loyalty towards it.

Also: 2003.

by Syracusan on Nov 17, 2008 4:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Football

I agree Sean. Football hurts a lot more. Right now we are a basketball school, but the school craves football even if it doesn’t realize it. Students will say they don’t care, but if we had a solid, winning football team we would be football crazy. I believe that. Gameday tailgating would be intense. The Dome would scare the shit out of opposing teams.

Most people are going to say basketball is more important, but I think if they lay in bed at night and were truly honest with themselves, they would take a top ten football team over basketball success. The only caveat is a championship victory. I would take another NCAA tourney title over a BCS football team. Of course I would take a BCS champion team over a championship basketball team. You get the idea.
I do agree with the rivalry argument to a point. I think we do not really have any good rivalries, but if we were a good team, I think they would develop. WVU and Pitt I believe would become rivalries. Perhaps UConn. Nothing builds animosity with teams like kicking their ass.

Also, the argument is being made that basketball gets more national attention and therefore is more important to be good. Well they get the attention because they are good. If our football team was a good team (consistently ranked) we would get tons of ink. With the number of Cuse alums in the sports journalism world, we would get more national attention than we would know what to do with if we played like the football teams of old. Possibly even more so considering how bad we’ve been. Rags to riches ya know?

by NOLACuse on Nov 17, 2008 4:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I should point out...

As a bit of proof about my notion that the football team would get plenty of national attention if we were good: ESPN has posted not only the story and video about G-Rob’s firing in their headlines, but now put Bennet’s blog entry mentioning Edsall’s disinterest in our vacant coaching position in their headlines. You could say slow news day, but I don’t think UConn gets a frontpage nod if the situation were reversed.

by NOLACuse on Nov 17, 2008 5:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

did we get press in the days of old?

If our football team was a good team (consistently ranked) we would get tons of ink. With the number of Cuse alums in the sports journalism world, we would get more national attention than we would know what to do with if we played like the football teams of old. Possibly even more so considering how bad we’ve been. Rags to riches ya know?

I just don’t remember Syracuse getting tons of ink back in the day when we were consistently in the top 25, even with a good amount of stars popping up each year in the NFL. So minus the rags to riches aspect, I’m not sure if I see the media attention happening once we’re good again. I mean, even now I’m surprised when there’s a story in the national media or a mention on ESPN about how far Syracuse is fallen. I just don’t think it matters much nationally.

But let’s say the basketball team suffers after Jimmy B retires in 27 years. That’s going to be a big deal in the news. Maybe I’m crazy, or delusional. Maybe no one cares about Syracuse nationally no matter what sport we’re talking about.

Or more important, maybe this isn’t part of the argument. Maybe we should just say, “Who cares what the media thinks when it comes to what matters more to the fans?” But I still argue that outside of the fan base, people will always care more about Syracuse basketball than Syracuse football.

by voteprime on Nov 17, 2008 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I base my media attention argument largely on the fact that we almost certainly now have more alums in the system than ever before. Although I do think it’s slippery as to whether or not media attention should matter at all, as you mentioned. I really don’t think I can agree that people will always care more about basketball though. Let’s say in six years we have a football that is in the hunt for the championship game or at least looks to get a BCS berth. And let’s say the basketball team is where they are now. I think the fact that the season started yesterday would barely register with most people. Not until the b-ball team played a big game would most people start talking about it. Or flip the script. If our football was in the hunt for a BCS game (a couple losses, but close to or on top of the Big East) but our basketball team was expected to finish 13th or 14th in the conference. I don’t think fans would be paying attention to, much less bemoaning the basketball team until well into January.

 Maybe the reality is quite simply whoever is good is loved.

by NOLACuse on Nov 17, 2008 5:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

don't hate on the potential of SU football to matter

Make no mistake, if SU football somehow regained its quality, I think both the national media and the community of college football would welcome us back with open arms and lots of positive pub. SU has a proud and storied football tradition, and people know it. It’s easier for a program like Syracuse to regain national attention because of what we’ve done in the past. It wouldn’t be like Arizona State suddenly being top ten and no one caring. There would be much talk of SU regaining its rightful place in the narrative of tough, historic northeastern programs alongside Penn State and…uh…Penn State. We’re missing from the script right now, but there’s a place for us. Even though I’m a massive basketball partisan, I’m also the guy who penned this review:

The Express: Great Movie or Greatest Movie?

I’m well aware that our football program has the potential to stand on the shoulder of giants and regain national media attention on par with the basketball team — and that’s on top of our welcome advantage with alums in the sports journalism industry. But it’s not 1959, it’s 2008. And today basketball is king.

by Syracusan on Nov 17, 2008 6:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think there are a couple things at work here

1. Identification of Syracuse as a “football” or “basketball” school has a lot to do with generation. I know a bunch of older Syracuse-types that will always see SU as a “football” school simply because college football used to rule the roost since college hoops was in its nascent period. On the flip side, younger partisans see SU as a basketball school due to the exponential growth in popularity of college hoops.

I think this is best epitomized in the conversations about Archbold and Manley; those that see Syracuse as a football school tend to speak more about Archbold; those that see Syracuse as a hoops school tend to talk about the good old days of the Manley Zoo.

2. The second point deals with Syracuse’s alumni and student make-up. Being a private school that pretty much draws its student body from a national stage, students (and alumni) have predispositions of sports they like best due to their pre-Syracuse sporting preferences. Thus, the kids that come from football-first backgrounds (Pennsylvanians, etc.), will always identify Syracuse as a football school simply because that is the sport they followed most fervently. Those that come from hoops-centric origins (NYC kids, people like me from Connecticut), will see Syracuse as a basketball mecca.

This factor has had a huge impact on how the fanbase views Syracuse, simply because the majority of Orange Nation is somehow tied to its alumni base (sorry, locals).

3. The final point has to deal with league affiliation. Traditionally, I think this moves into the camp of Syracuse as a football school. The Orange maintained a more consistent football schedule — Penn State, Maryland, Colgate, etc. — than it did a hoops schedule. I think when you can point to consistency in opponent (and the development of rivalries), you naturally create incentive to care and watch.

But with the affiliation of Syracuse into the Big East, the game changes. Dave Gavitt invented the Big East to be a basketball powerhouse. When Syracuse joined, it tacitly agreed that its future was built on hoops, and that the university would always support a basketball program. I think that erodes my first “historical” point, but is necessary for the discussion.

I know that this was about 1,000 words that doesn’t have a conclusion, but it does reach the sentiment that Syracuse isn’t any kind of school, hoops, football, or otherwise.

But in the end, that doesn’t really matter to me because I like lacrosse season the most.

by Hoya Suxa on Nov 17, 2008 5:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

But in the end, that doesn’t really matter to me because I like lacrosse season the most.

What a twist!

by voteprime on Nov 17, 2008 5:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you hit it near the head

Not that anyone is reading this thread anymore.

Much of my original point was that those whose identification with Syracuse began within the past 30 years will care more about basketball, because it has been the dominant program (in terms of national and local coverage and prestige) over that time. Naturally, the more successful program will be more popular (cf. Tennessee’s love of women’s basketball) and as we form our allegiances we will lean towards that program. But I neglected the opinion of alumni who arrived on campus already being football fans first. Those folks might likely have a preference for a strong football program. Especially if they were on campus during the ‘90s football resurgence. And seeing as how football tends to be more popular nationally than basketball, there will be a large number of fans in this group that I didn’t consider.

I could say more, but why bother. It’s snowing outside and the Richmond game will be on soon.

PS. Hire Turner Gill.

by SyraJosh on Nov 18, 2008 4:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let's just admit it. The Dome is

The House That Katie Rowan Built

by Sean Keeley on Nov 17, 2008 5:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I had a new thought

I think this question depends very much on who you ask: students or regional fans.

The students are most likely to identify with the team that is doing the best at the time because that is what is exciting. You always have people who like football the most or basketball the most, but in general I think students care about the team that is the most fun to watch and that then stays with with them. Right now, and for the past decade really, that team is basketball.

Now the regional fans, I think, want a good football team. Why else would people still be tailgating? There isn’t a lot of it, but there is some and that means people are clinging to what little football enjoyment they can find. The region is a football one and I think the natives want a strong return to national prominence on the gridiron. They enjoy the basketball team and root for it all the way, but if football returns you will see much more passion for that I believe.

And if all else at least we have the lacrosse team. They almost never disappoint and even when they do, they win national championships within a couple of years.

by NOLACuse on Nov 18, 2008 1:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Syracuse football, basketball & lacrosse blog.
Start posting about the Orange »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Hwl_small
The new look, it's coming.
Small
T-Shirt Contest Winners
Me_wig_small
Kris Joseph is the Sixth Man of the Year
Small
Floyd Little Elected to NFL Hall of Fame
Small
Gottlieb now has some love for the Cuse
Wes_small
Stop talking about Nova.
Small
Georgetown
Small
Seth Davis' Weekend Picks
Dsc_4848_small
UPDATED: Jimmy B for Coach of The Year
Dscn1616_2_small
SYRACUSE v. 'NOVA TICKETS!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Payin Bills


Managers

Untitled_small Sean Keeley

Official Partner of CBS Sports